Development of the Adolescents’ Communicative Culture in the Context of Digitalization of Additional Education

Dedy Achmad Kurniady, David I. Philippov, Aan Komariah, . Sururi, Asep Suryana, Veronica M. Grebennikova, Natalya I. Nikitina, Mikhail E. Kosov, Natalia V. Lazareva, Olesya V. Dudnik

Abstract


In the era of digitalization of education and economy and the development of artificial intelligence, adolescents appear highly competitive compared with other generations in understanding digital technologies, acquiring expertise, and mastering modern means of communication, which normally causes intergenerational conflicts and the loss of an adult’s personal and functional authority. The aim of this research was to develop and test a model for developing adolescents’ communicative cultures in an institution of additional education. The research emphasizes the significance of personality-oriented, interactive-communicative, and cultural approaches and conducts a comparative analysis of the sources. Methodologically, the study relies on a quantitative method with primary sources. Besides, the findings of the study contribute to the existing limited stress on the importance of adolescents’ communicative cultures from the perspective of the digitalization of additional education. The study finds that the use of digital options in education has reduced social interaction among students. However, the students prefer to use digital methods of learning as they find them more convenient for communication. Therefore, the digital communication culture has high potential in the educational sector. The findings are novel as this study is one of the few recent studies that examined how communicative culture has transformed due to digital means in education.

 

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-SIED-019

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Additional Education; Communication; Culture; Adolescent; Digitalization.

References


Ehrenreich, S. E., George, M. J., Burnell, K., & Underwood, M. K. (2021). Importance of Digital Communication in Adolescents’ Development: Theoretical and Empirical Advancements in the Last Decade. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 928–943. doi:10.1111/jora.12643.

Yau, J. C., McPartlan, P., & Reich, S. M. (2021). Motives for Texting During Early Adolescence. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3, 602368. doi:10.3389/fhumd.2021.602368.

Tsyvunina, A. D. (2020). The Communicative Culture Of Adolescents In The Era Of Informatization And Digitalization. Pedagogical Education - History, Present Time, Perspectives, 87, 693–699. doi:10.15405/epsbs.2020.08.02.91.

Brdesee, H. (2021). A divergent view of the impact of digital transformation on academic organizational and spending efficiency: A review and analytical study on a university E-service. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(13), 7048. doi:10.3390/su13137048.

Law Insider. (2022). Additional education definition. Available online: https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/additional-education (accessed on August 2022).

Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education, 182, 104463. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463.

Radu, M. C., Schnakovszky, C., Herghelegiu, E., Ciubotariu, V. A., & Cristea, I. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of educational process: A student survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1–15. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217770.

Makarova, E. (2018). Comprehention Of Written Utterances’ Communicative Structure By Russian Learners Of English. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. doi:10.15405/epsbs.2018.04.02.22.

Hussien, A. M. (2018). Culture of Traits in Arabic language education: Students’ perception of the Communicative Traits Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 467–484. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11429a.

Owen, E. A., & Razali, A. B. (2018). The effect of communicative activities on Libyan secondary school students’ speaking performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 45–60. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.1144a.

Zhichkina, A. E. (2018). Social and psychological aspects of communication on the internet. Flogiston. Available online: http://flogiston.ru/articles/netpsy/refinf (accessed on August 2022). (In Russian).

BEJINARU, R. (2013). Impact of Digitalization on Education in the Knowledge Economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 367–380. doi:10.25019/mdke/7.3.06.

Bloomberg, J. (2018). Digitization, digitalization, and digital transformation: confuse them at your peril. Forbes. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2018/04/29/digitization-digitalization-and-digital-transformation-confuse -them-at-your-peril/?sh=3bfb6d9e2f2c (accessed on May 2022).

Kaur, H. (2019). Digitalization of education: Advantages and disadvantages. International Journal of Applied Research, SP4, 282–285.

Dienlin, T., & Johannes, N. (2020). The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 135–142. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/tdienlin.

Twenge, J. M. (2020). Why increases in adolescent depression may be linked to the technological environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 89–94. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.036.

Trucco, D., Palma, A., & UNICEF. (2020). Childhood and adolescence in the digital age: A comparative report of the Kids Online surveys on Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay. United Nations, Santiago, Chile. Available online: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45835/1/S2000333_en.pdf (accessed on August 2022).

Kapetanovic, S., Rothenberg, W. A., Lansford, J. E., Bornstein, M. H., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., Dodge, K. A., Gurdal, S., Malone, P. S., Oburu, P., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Steinberg, L., Tapanya, S., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Yotanyamaneewong, S., Peña Alampay, L., … Bacchini, D. (2020). Cross-Cultural Examination of Links between Parent–Adolescent Communication and Adolescent Psychological Problems in 12 Cultural Groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(6), 1225–1244. doi:10.1007/s10964-020-01212-2.

Kapetanovic, S., Boele, S., & Skoog, T. (2019). Parent-Adolescent Communication and Adolescent Delinquency: Unraveling Within-Family Processes from Between-Family Differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(9), 1707–1723. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01043-w.

Janssen, H. J., Bruinsma, G. J. N., Deković, M., & Eichelsheim, V. I. (2018). A Between- and Within-Person Analysis of Parenting and Time Spent in Criminogenic Settings During Adolescence: The Role of Self-Control and Delinquent Attitudes. Youth and Society, 50(2), 229–254. doi:10.1177/0044118X16636138.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students (7th Ed.). Pearson, Harlow, United Kingdom.

Ryan, G. (2018). Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Nurse Researcher, 25(4), 14–20. doi:10.7748/nr.2018.e1466.

Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T., & Fu, Y. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. Sage, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.4135/9781473957893.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd Ed.). Routledge, New York, United States. doi:10.4324/9781315750606.

Landrum, B., & Garza, G. (2015). Mending fences: Defining the domains and approaches of quantitative and qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 2(2), 199–209. doi:10.1037/qup0000030.

Rahman, M. S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. doi:10.5539/jel.v6n1p102.

Sarkies, M. N., Bowles, K. A., Skinner, E. H., Mitchell, D., Haas, R., Ho, M., Salter, K., May, K., Markham, D., O’Brien, L., Plumb, S., & Haines, T. P. (2015). Data collection methods in health services research hospital length of stay and discharge destination. Applied Clinical Informatics, 6(1), 96–109. doi:10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0097.

Paradis, E., O’Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. T. (2016). Design: Selection of Data Collection Methods. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(2), 263–264. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-16-00098.1.

Rhodes, R. (2005). Rethinking Research Ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5(1), 7–28. doi:10.1080/15265160590900678.

Berry, K.J., Kvamme, K.L., Johnston, J.E., Mielke, Jr., P.W. (2021). Central Tendency and Variability. Permutation Statistical Methods with R. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74361-1_4.

Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 187–200. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001.

Sigman, A. (2009). Well connected. Biologist, 56(1), 14-20.

Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. Random House, New York, United States.

Butler, G. (2016). Overcoming social anxiety and shyness: A self-help guide using cognitive behavioural techniques. Hachette New York, United States.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-SIED-019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Dedy Achmad Kurniady, David I. Philippov, Aan Komariah, Sururi Sururi, Asep Suryana, Veronica M. Grebennikova, Natalya I. Nikitina, Mikhail E. Kosov, Natalia V. Lazareva, Olesya V. Dudnik