Beyond Social Norms: Exploring the Drivers of Youth's Political Participation Via Social Media

Marta Santos; Mijail Naranjo-Zolotov; Le Anh Nguyen Long; Albert Acedo; Afshin Ashofteh; Manuela Aparí­cio

doi:10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-05

Authors

Marta Santos NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312, Lisboa,, Portugal
Mijail Naranjo-Zolotov
mijail.naranjo@novaims.unl.pt
NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312, Lisboa,, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5153-3315
Le Anh Nguyen Long Department of Public Administration, University of Twente, Enschede,, Netherlands
Albert Acedo NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312, Lisboa,, Portugal
Afshin Ashofteh NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312, Lisboa,, Portugal
Manuela Aparício NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312, Lisboa,, Portugal

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): April

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

This study examines the factors driving online political participation among young adults by integrating the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Civic Voluntarism Model. Structural equation modelling was applied using survey data from 236 young adults to analyse the relationships between attitudes, subjective norms, psychological engagement, political interactions, and resource availability. The findings indicate that attitudes and psychological engagement”comprising political interest, efficacy, and involvement”are the primary drivers of online political participation. In contrast, subjective norms and resource availability have no significant effect, suggesting that online engagement is primarily self-motivated rather than influenced by social expectations or material constraints. Furthermore, political interactions shape subjective norms, but these norms do not significantly impact participation intentions. This study contributes to understanding youth political engagement in digital environments by demonstrating that intrinsic psychological factors outweigh external influences. The findings have practical implications for strategies aimed at increasing youth political participation through social media, emphasising the need to foster political interest and efficacy rather than relying on peer influence or resource provision. By refining existing models of political engagement, this research provides a clearer framework for understanding and enhancing youth participation in democratic processes through digital platforms.

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-05

Full Text: PDF

Santos, M., Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Nguyen Long, L. A., Acedo, A., Ashofteh, A., & Aparício, M. (2025). Beyond Social Norms: Exploring the Drivers of Youth’s Political Participation Via Social Media. Emerging Science Journal, 9(2), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-05

Download Citation

Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The Effects of Digital Media on Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns: Evidence from Panel Data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. doi:10.1177/0093650211426004.

Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x.

Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403–419. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.663626.

Nartey, M., & Yu, Y. (2023). A Discourse Analytic Study of #FixTheCountry on Ghanaian Twitter. Social Media and Society, 9(1), 20563051221147330. doi:10.1177/20563051221147328.

Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(3), 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226.

Costa, P. (2022). Youth Political Participation in Portugal. Gulbenkian Studies, Portugal. Available online: https://cdn.gulbenkian.pt/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/RelatoÌrio-02-final_red.pdf (accessed on March 2025).

Theocharis, Y., & Quintelier, E. (2016). Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media and Society, 18(5), 817–836. doi:10.1177/1461444814549006.

Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. doi:10.1177/0267323118760317.

Kim, Y., Russo, S., & Amnå, E. (2017). The longitudinal relation between online and offline political participation among youth at two different developmental stages. New Media and Society, 19(6), 899–917. doi:10.1177/1461444815624181.

Li, Y., Bernard, J. G., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2021). Beyond Clicktivism: What Makes Digitally Native Activism Effective? An Exploration of the Sleeping Giants Movement. Social Media and Society, 7(3), 20563051211035356. doi:10.1177/20563051211035357.

Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young People, Digital Media, and Engagement: A Meta-Analysis of Research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. doi:10.1177/0894439318814190.

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Johnson, B. K. (2014). Selective Exposure for Better or Worse: Its Mediating Role for Online News' Impact on Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 184–196. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12036.

Macková, A., Novotná, M., Čejková, L., & Hrbková, L. (2024). One way or another? Discussion disagreement and attitudinal homogeneity on social networking sites as pathways to polarization in Czechia. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 21(1), 54–68. doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2202650.

Moffett, K. W., & Rice, L. L. (2018). College Students and Online Political Expression during the 2016 Election. Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 422–439. doi:10.1177/0894439317721186.

Chan, M., Chen, H. T., & Lee, F. L. F. (2021). Cross-Cutting Discussion on Social Media and Online Political Participation: A Cross-National Examination of Information Seeking and Social Accountability Explanations. Social Media and Society, 7(3), 20563051211035696. doi:10.1177/20563051211035697.

Chen, C., Bai, Y., & Wang, R. (2019). Online political efficacy and political participation: A mediation analysis based on the evidence from Taiwan. New Media and Society, 21(8), 1667–1696. doi:10.1177/1461444819828718.

Chayinska, M., Miranda, D., & González, R. (2021). A longitudinal study of the bidirectional causal relationships between online political participation and offline collective action. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106810. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106810.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, United States.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, United States.

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, United States.

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939.

Randall, D. M., & Wolff, J. A. (1994). The time interval in the intention"behaviour relationship: Meta"analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 405–418. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01037.x.

Choi, G., & Chung, H. (2013). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Social Networking Sites (SNS): Impact of Subjective Norm and Social Capital on the Acceptance of SNS. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(10), 619–628. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.756333.

Alharbi, A., Kang, K., & Hawryszkiewycz, I. (2015). The influence of trust and subjective norms on citizens' intentions to engage in E-participation on E-government websites. ACIS 2015 Proceedings - 26th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 1-12. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1606.00746.

Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the Intention to Use Technology by Preservice Teachers: An Empirical Test of Competing Theoretical Models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178–188. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.581892.

Mir, H. H., Parveen, S., Mullick, N. H., & Nabi, S. (2021). Using structural equation modeling to predict Indian people's attitudes and intentions towards COVID-19 vaccination. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 15(3), 1017–1022. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2021.05.006.

Wang, X. (2015). Using attitude functions, self-efficacy, and norms to predict attitudes and intentions to use mobile devices to access social media during sporting event attendance. Mobile Media and Communication, 3(1), 75–90. doi:10.1177/2050157914548932.

Singh, K., Leong, S. M., Tan, C. T., & Wong, K. C. (1995). A theory of reasoned action perspective of voting behavior: Model and empirical test. Psychology & Marketing, 12(1), 37–51. doi:10.1002/mar.4220120104.

Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x.

Bode, L. (2017). Gateway Political Behaviors: The Frequency and Consequences of Low-Cost Political Engagement on Social Media. Social Media and Society, 3(4), 2056305117743349. doi:10.1177/2056305117743349.

Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2017). From online disagreement to offline action: How diverse motivations for using social media can increase political information sharing and catalyze offline political participation. Social Media and Society, 3(3), 2056305117716274. doi:10.1177/2056305117716274.

Riedl, M. J., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. C. (2023). Political Influencers on Social Media: An Introduction. Social Media and Society, 9(2), 20563051231177936. doi:10.1177/20563051231177938.

Koc-Michalska, K., & Lilleker, D. (2017). Digital Politics: Mobilization, Engagement, and Participation. Political Communication, 34(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1243178.

Tripopsakul, S., Puriwat, W., Hoonsopon, D., & Songkhla, R. N. (2024). The impact of brand value on business performance: An analysis of moderating effects of product involvement. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 5(1), 79-87. doi:10.28991/HIJ-2024-05-01-06.

Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2019). Antecedents of internal political efficacy incidental news exposure online and the mediating role of political discussion. Politics, 39(1), 82–100. doi:10.1177/0263395717693251.

Kim, T. (2021). The impact of election outcome on internal political efficacy: The role of contextual factors. Electoral Studies, 74, 102406. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102406.

Baber, H. (2020). Intentions to participate in political crowdfunding- from the perspective of civic voluntarism model and theory of planned behavior. Technology in Society, 63, 101435. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101435.

Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038.

Hunt, N. C., Iyer, G. S., & Jimenez, P. (2019). Election Outcome and Tax Compliance: The Role of Political Party Affiliation, Affect Balance, and Trust in Government. Applied Psychology, 68(2), 341–372. doi:10.1111/apps.12165.

Milner, M., Rice, S., & Rice, C. (2019). Support for environmentally-friendly airports influenced by political affiliation and social identity. Technology in Society, 59, 101185. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101185.

Weeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. (2013). Predicting Dissemination of News Content in Social Media: A Focus on Reception, Friending, and Partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 212–232. doi:10.1177/1077699013482906.

Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 641–661. doi:10.1111/hcre.12092.

Kitanova, M. (2020). Youth political participation in the EU: evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 819–836. doi:10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951.

Jumaidi, A., Mustanir, M., Yusuf, T. R., & Sanusi, S. (2024). Political Study Analyses of Education Policy to Improve Education Quality. Emerging Science Journal, 8(4), 1420–1439. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-04-011.

Xenos, M. A., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer?: Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. In The Networked Young Citizen: Social Media, Political Participation and Civic Engagement (pp. 17–38). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315778594.

Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political effects of the internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 415–438. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239.

Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York, United States.

Vasyunina, M., Kosov, M., Gorlova, O., Masterov, A., Zambaev, K., Safronova, E., & Shmigol, N. (2024). New Economic Model and Conceptual Directions for Increasing Russia's Regional Budgets Sustainability. Emerging Science Journal, 8(2), 603-624. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-02-015.

Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media and Society, 18(9), 1817–1839. doi:10.1177/1461444815616221.

Lance Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2015). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Handbook of Digital Politics: Edward Elgar Publishing, 169–198. doi:10.4337/9781782548768.00020.

Kim, Y., & Chen, H. T. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 320–330. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.008.

Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183–216. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y.

Gainous, J., Marlowe, A. D., & Wagner, K. M. (2013). Traditional Cleavages or a New World: Does Online Social Networking Bridge the Political Participation Divide? International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 26(2), 145–158. doi:10.1007/s10767-013-9130-2.

Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the internet. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 487–509. doi:10.1017/S1537592710001210.

Oser, J., & Boulianne, S. (2020). Reinforcement effects between digital media use and political participation : a meta-analysis of repeated-wave panel data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 355–365. doi:10.1093/poq/nfaa017.

Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966. doi:10.1177/0093650218808186.

Chen, H. T., & Lin, J. S. (2021). Cross-cutting and Like-minded Discussion on Social Media: The Moderating Role of Issue Importance in the (De) mobilizing Effect of Political Discussion on Political Participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 65(1), 135–156. doi:10.1080/08838151.2021.1897822.

Diemer, M. A., & Rapa, L. J. (2016). Unraveling the Complexity of Critical Consciousness, Political Efficacy, and Political Action Among Marginalized Adolescents. Child Development, 87(1), 221–238. doi:10.1111/cdev.12446.

Wang, T., & Shen, F. (2018). Perceived party polarization, news attentiveness, and political participation: a mediated moderation model. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(6), 620–637. doi:10.1080/01292986.2018.1494204.

Beldad, A., van der Geest, T., de Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2012). Shall I Tell You Where I Live and Who I Am? Factors Influencing the Behavioral Intention to Disclose Personal Data for Online Government Transactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 163–177. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.572331.

Shneor, R., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework. Journal of Business Research, 103, 56–70. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.013.

Zhang, X., & Lin, W. Y. (2014). Political participation in an unlikely place: How individuals engage in politics through social networking sites in China. International Journal of Communication, 8(1), 21–42.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.

Hair, Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, New York, United States.

Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001.

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1), 1-12. doi:10.2307/41410402.

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2023). "PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet”–retrospective observations and recent advances. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 31(3), 261–275. doi:10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488.

Kim, H., Kim, Y., & Lee, D. (2020). Understanding the Role of Social Media in Political Participation: Integrating Political Knowledge and Bridging Social Capital from the Social Cognitive Approach. International Journal of Communication, 14, 4803–4824.

Chan, M., & Guo, J. (2013). The role of political efficacy on the relationship between Facebook use and participatory behaviors: A comparative study of young American and Chinese adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 460–463. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0468.

Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., Giliatt, N., & Mee, J. F. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. doi:10.1086/376806.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.

Matthes, J., & Marquart, F. (2015). A New Look at Campaign Advertising and Political Engagement: Exploring the Effects of Opinion-Congruent and -Incongruent Political Advertisements. Communication Research, 42(1), 134–155. doi:10.1177/0093650213514600.

Oni, A. A., Oni, S., Mbarika, V., & Ayo, C. K. (2017). Empirical study of user acceptance of online political participation: Integrating Civic Voluntarism Model and Theory of Reasoned Action. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 317–328. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.003.

Jadil, Y., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Understanding the drivers of online trust and intention to buy on a website: An emerging market perspective. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100065. doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100065.

Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x.

Quintelier, E. (2007). Differences in political participation between young and old people. Contemporary Politics, 13(2), 165–180. doi:10.1080/13569770701562658.

Alarabi, K., Al Abidi, S., Pagani, L. S., Tairab, H., Alhosani, Y., Rabbani, L., & Al Mansoori, M. (2024). Bridging the Gap: Social Networks and Professional Development in the Eyes of Prospective Science Teachers. Emerging Science Journal, 8(1), 192-204. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-01-014.

Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788–811. doi:10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410.

Marquart, F., Ohme, J., & Möller, J. (2020). Following politicians on social media: Effects for political information, peer communication, and youth engagement. Media and Communication, 8(2), 196–207. doi:10.17645/mac.v8i2.2764.

Nam, T. (2011). Whose e-democracy the democratic divide in American electoral campaigns. Information Polity, 16(2), 131–150. doi:10.3233/IP-2011-0220.

Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). How Popular Culture Prompts Youth Collective Political Expression and Cross-Cutting Political Talk on Social Media: A Cross-Platform Analysis. Social Media and Society, 7(2), 20563051211008820. doi:10.1177/20563051211008821.

Choi, J. (2016). Differential Use, Differential Effects: Investigating the Roles of Different Modes of News Use in Promoting Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 436–450. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12176.

Schulte-Cloos, J., & Leininger, A. (2022). Electoral participation, political disaffection, and the rise of the populist radical right. Party Politics, 28(3), 431–443. doi:10.1177/1354068820985186.

Reeher, G. (2004). Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Perspectives on Politics, 2(02), 366-367. doi:10.1017/s1537592704380977.

Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337.

Haste, H., & Hogan, A. (2006). Beyond conventional civic participation, beyond the moral-political divide: Young people and contemporary debates about citizenship. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 473–493. doi:10.1080/03057240601012238.

Hsu, M. H., Yen, C. H., Chiu, C. M., & Chang, C. M. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of continued online shopping behavior: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(9), 889–904. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.04.004.

Acceptance Rate:	21%
Review Speed:	74 days
Issue Per Year:	6
Number of Volumes:	7
Number of Issues:	44
Number of Articles:	493
Number of Reviewers:	1187
Number of Contributors:	1394
Contributing Countries:	83
No. of WoS Citations:	2609
No. of Scopus Citations:	2936
No. of Google Citations:	4161
Google h-index:	29
Google i10-index:	126
Abstract Views:	681,807
PDF Download:	492,524

Beyond Social Norms: Exploring the Drivers of Youth's Political Participation Via Social Media

Authors

Downloads

Downloads

Login

submission

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

IndexedBy

Indexing and Abstracting

twitter

Social Media

Analytics

Analytics

Information

Most Cited Articles

Optical and Structural Characterization of Bi2FexNbO7 Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications

Digital Transformation: Opportunities and Challenges for Leaders in the Emerging Countries in Response to Covid-19 Pandemic

Thermal Regeneration and Reuse of Carbon and Glass Fibers from Waste Composites

Impediments of Green Finance Adoption System: Linking Economy and Environment

Address

Contact Info:

Beyond Social Norms: Exploring the Drivers of Youth's Political Participation Via Social Media

Authors

Downloads

Downloads

Login

submission

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

social

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

IndexedBy

Indexing and Abstracting

twitter

Social Media

Analytics

Analytics

Information

Most Cited Articles

Optical and Structural Characterization of Bi2FexNbO7 Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications

Digital Transformation: Opportunities and Challenges for Leaders in the Emerging Countries in Response to Covid-19 Pandemic

Thermal Regeneration and Reuse of Carbon and Glass Fibers from Waste Composites

Impediments of Green Finance Adoption System: Linking Economy and Environment