A New Approach to Development of Students' Research Abilities in STEM Education

Yelmurat Dosymov; Esim Ergobek; Sherzod Ramankulov; Almagul Ualikhan; Indira Usembayeva; Bakitzhan Kurbanbekov

doi:10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-013

Authors

Yelmurat Dosymov Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan,, Kazakhstan
Esim Ergobek Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan,, Kazakhstan
Sherzod Ramankulov
sh.ramankulov.ayu.edu.kz@outlook.com
Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan,, Kazakhstan
Almagul Ualikhan Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan,, Kazakhstan
Indira Usembayeva Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan,, Kazakhstan
Bakitzhan Kurbanbekov Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan,, Kazakhstan

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

The study develops a modern concept of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education as an essential component for students' research abilities. The study's goal is to enhance students' research skills in STEM subjects by using ionization chambers as a tool for educational research. This aim emphasizes the study's novel use of ionization chambers to improve STEM students' practical skills and theoretical understanding. The research hypotheses were tested using quantitative experimental methods involving pre- and post-experiment assessments. Scientific articles were analyzed using key terms such as "ionization chamber," "STEM," and "research skills" from the Mendeley database to establish a theoretical foundation. A meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate the efficacy of the outcomes. An assessment involving 120 students from the Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University was conducted to evaluate the influence on them, with favorable findings. Since both groups had the same dependent variable in control tasks, there was no significant difference before the trial (t(118) = 0.7749, p > 0.05). The dependent variable was reassessed after 15 weeks of training. Statistics show a significant improvement in the experimental group (t(118) = 7.8335, p < 0.05), showing that ionization chambers increased STEM students' research abilities. Using ionization chambers in the natural science curriculum may enhance students' research abilities and provide a more effective integration of theory and practice. Kazakhstan uses cutting-edge research tools like ionization chambers to cover STEM teaching gaps and boost student engagement and practical skills. The research recommends integrating these technologies into curricula and teacher training.

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-013

Full Text: PDF

Dosymov, Y., Ergobek, E., Ramankulov, S., Ualikhan, A., Usembayeva, I., & Kurbanbekov, B. (2025). A New Approach to Development of Students’ Research Abilities in STEM Education. Emerging Science Journal, 9(2), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-013

Download Citation

Li, X., & Li, Y. (2023). Individualized and Innovation-Centered General Education in a Chinese STEM University. Education Sciences, 13(8), 846. doi:10.3390/educsci13080846.

Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-24. doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7.

Wan, Z. H., Jiang, Y., & Zhan, Y. (2021). STEM Education in Early Childhood: A Review of Empirical Studies. Early Education and Development, 32(7), 940–962. doi:10.1080/10409289.2020.1814986.

Huang, B., Siu-Yung Jong, M., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., Chai, C. S., & Yi-Chao Jiang, M. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers and Education, 189, 104577. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577.

Vozenin, M. C., Loo, B. W., Tantawi, S., Maxim, P. G., Spitz, D. R., Bailat, C., & Limoli, C. L. (2024). FLASH: New intersection of physics, chemistry, biology, and cancer medicine. Reviews of Modern Physics, 96(3), 035002. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.96.035002.

Ewim, D. R. E., Nundlal, Y., Govender, K., Nzuke, N. L., Mbatha, M. V., Gwexa, N., Naidoo, K., Laseinde, O. T., & Abolarin, S. M. (2023). Knowledge, awareness, and perception of senior high school learners towards nuclear energy: A South African case study. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 15(7), 866–884. doi:10.1080/20421338.2023.2213965.

Chu, W. W., Ong, E. T., Ayop, S. K., Mohd Azmi, M. S., Abdullah, A. S., Abd Karim, N. S., & Tho, S. W. (2023). The innovative use of smartphone for sound STEM practical kit: a pilot implementation for secondary classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(3), 1008–1030. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1978963.

Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of stem disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and stem careers within science teachers' conceptions of integrated stem education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 737. doi:10.3390/educsci11110737.

Li, Y., Xu, P., Zhan, Q., Yang, L., & Yang, H. (2023). Effect of Hydrogen Isotope Morphology in Ionization Chamber on Tritium Measurement. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 57(12), 2428–2434. doi:10.7538/yzk.2023.youxian.0045.

Hackett, S. L., Van Asselen, B., Wolthaus, J. W. H., Kok, J. G. M., Woodings, S. J., Lagendijk, J. J. W., & Raaymakers, B. W. (2016). Consequences of air around an ionization chamber: Are existing solid phantoms suitable for reference dosimetry on an MR-linac? Medical Physics, 43(7), 3961–3968. doi:10.1118/1.4952727.

Hill, R., Mo, Z., Haque, M., & Baldock, C. (2009). An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage x-ray beams. Medical Physics, 36(9), 3971–3981. doi:10.1118/1.3183820.

Iakovenko, V., Keller, B., Sahgal, A., & Sarfehnia, A. (2020). Experimental measurement of ionization chamber angular response and associated magnetic field correction factors in MR-linac. Medical Physics, 47(4), 1940–1948. doi:10.1002/mp.14025.

Rossomme, S., Lorentini, S., Vynckier, S., Delor, A., Vidal, M., Lourenço, A., & Palmans, H. (2021). Correction of the measured current of a small-gap plane-parallel ionization chamber in proton beams in the presence of charge multiplication. Zeitschrift Fur Medizinische Physik, 31(2), 192–202. doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.01.008.

Yepes, I., Barone, D. A. C., & Porciuncula, C. M. D. (2022). Use of Drones as Pedagogical Technology in STEM Disciplines. Informatics in Education, 21(1), 201–233. doi:10.15388/infedu.2022.08.

Norlaili, N., Al Huda, A. M., Yuliani, H., & Azizah, N. (2022). Literature Research: The Use of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) In Physics Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 45. doi:10.20527/jipf.v6i1.4153.

Sungur Gül, K., & Ateş, H. (2023). An examination of the effect of technology-based STEM education training in the framework of technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8761–8787. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11539-x.

Pattayev, A., Genc, N., Ramankulov, S., Polatuly, S., Tuiyebayev, M., Usembayeva, I., & Rizakhojayeva, G. (2024). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using STEAM Projects in Teaching Physics: Student Interest in the Field of Solar Energy. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 678–693. doi:10.48161/qaj.v4n3a911.

Al Shamsi, I. R. (2024). Optimizing STEM Education via e-Learning: Addressing Challenges and Strategic Planning for Graduate Employment Outcomes. Emerging Science Journal, 8, 231-248. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-SIED1-014.

Abayeva, N., Mustafina, L., Zhurov, V., Yerakhtina, I., & Mustafina, B. (2024). Leveraging Mathematics to Enhance Critical Thinking in Technical Universities. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 566–581. doi:10.24191/ajue.v20i3.27861.

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovič, V. M., & Jovanovič, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers and Education, 95, 309–327. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002.

Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13, 1045. doi:10.12688/f1000research.155367.1.

London, J. S., Lee, W. C., & Hawkins Ash, C. D. (2021). Potential engineers: A systematic literature review exploring Black children's access to and experiences with STEM. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(4), 1003–1026. doi:10.1002/jee.20426.

Abayeva, N., Zhurov, V., & Mustafina, L. (2024). Innovative massive open online course for young researchers: impact of implementation in Kazakhstani universities. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2378269. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2024.2378269.

Polidori, L., & Hage, M. El. (2020). Digital elevation model quality assessment methods: A critical review. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 1–36. doi:10.3390/rs12213522.

Alkabbany, I., Ali, A. M., Foreman, C., Tretter, T., Hindy, N., & Farag, A. (2023). An Experimental Platform for Real-Time Students Engagement Measurements from Video in STEM Classrooms. Sensors, 23(3), 1614. doi:10.3390/s23031614.

Jiao, S., Li, W., Li, Z., Gai, J., Zou, L., & Su, Y. (2024). Hybrid physics-machine learning models for predicting rate of penetration in the Halahatang oil field, Tarim Basin. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5957. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56640-y.

Khasawneh, M. A. S., & Darawsheh, S. (2023). Analyzing the Effects of Maker Spaces and 3D Printing Technology on Student Innovation and Design Thinking. Migration Letters, 20(6), 453–464. doi:10.59670/ml.v20i6.3497.

Demetroulis, E. A., Theodoropoulos, A., Wallace, M., Poulopoulos, V., & Antoniou, A. (2023). Collaboration Skills in Educational Robotics: A Methodological Approach”Results from Two Case Studies in Primary Schools. Education Sciences, 13(5), 468. doi:10.3390/educsci13050468.

Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students' self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. doi:10.1111/bjet.13020.

Loyens, S. M. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 351–357. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential Learning Theory: A Dynamic, Holistic Approach to Management Learning, Education and Development. The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, United States. doi:10.4135/9780857021038.n3.

Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students' critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 1-14. doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2.

Usembayeva, I., Kurbanbekov, B., Ramankulov, S., Batyrbekova, A., Kelesbayev, K., & Akhanova, A. (2024). 3D Modeling and Printing in Physics Education: The Importance of STEM Technology for Interpreting Physics Concepts. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 45–58. doi:10.48161/qaj.v4n3a727.

Thien, T. C., Nemallapudi, M. V., Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, A. E. (2023). Uniformity calibration for large area XY strip parallel plate ionization chamber. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 68(1), 15013. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aca9b5.

Heinrich, W. F., & Green, P. M. (2020). Remixing Approaches to Experiential Learning, Design, and Assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 205–223. doi:10.1177/1053825920915608.

Bell, R., & Bell, H. (2020). Applying educational theory to develop a framework to support the delivery of experiential entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(6), 987–1004. doi:10.1108/JSBED-01-2020-0012.

Ruhana, F., Rochmah, E. Y., Pada, A., Suryani, Y., & Rizki, A. M. (2024). Developing Creativity and Innovation in STEM Curriculum: Project-Based Approach in Secondary Education. Theory and Practice, 2024(5), 7188–7195. doi:10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4123.

Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100839. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839.

Awad, N. (2023). Exploring STEM integration: assessing the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary informal program in fostering students' performance and inspiration. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(2), 675–699. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1931832.

Souza, L. W. G., Perini, A. P., & Neves, L. P. (2024). A thermoelectric cloud chamber: II. Contributions to medical physics education. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 25702. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ad230f.

Aswal, D. K., & Chandra, A. (2024). Ionizing Radiation Measurements. Handbook on Radiation Environment, Volume 2. Springer, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2799-5_1.

Hurtado-Bermúdez, S., & Romero-Abrio, A. (2023). The effects of combining virtual laboratory and advanced technology research laboratory on university students' conceptual understanding of electron microscopy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1126–1141. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1821716.

Riska, M., & Riyoko Sarwono, S. (2024). Powtoon Learning Media Development for Increasing Motivation and Learning Outcomes Students in Civics Studies. Istanbul Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 65–73. doi:10.62185/issn.3023-5448.2.1.6.

Turysbayeva, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Yessenova, K., Bainazarova, T., & Maigeldiyeva, S. (2023). The impact of formative assessment techniques on students' self-assessment skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(4), 657–665. doi:10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5045.

Prajuabwan, P., & Worapun, W. (2023). The Use of STEM-Based Learning Activities to Promote Computational Thinking of Grade 5 Students. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4), 118. doi:10.5539/jel.v12n4p118.

Coskun Karabulut, H., Elcan kaynak, N., & Kariper, I. A. (2023). Pre service teachers' engagement with stem-based hands-on activities in online chemistry laboratory courses. Research in Science and Technological Education, 42(4), 1209–1229. doi:10.1080/02635143.2023.2215170.

Horng-Jyh, P. W., Cheng, C. H. K., Tah, B. L. Y., Lie, T. H., Beng, J. S. T., Guan, R. O. B., Yi, J. T. J., Ziwen, L., Arcuino, C. S. M., Chang, L. P. L., & Yongqing, Z. (2023). Virtual Lab Workspace for Programming Computers – Towards Agile STEM Education. Learning Technology for Education Challenges. LTEC 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1830, Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34754-2_5.

Aboelezz, E., & Pogue, B. W. (2023). Review of nanomaterial advances for ionizing radiation dosimetry. Applied Physics Reviews, 10(2), 021312. doi:10.1063/5.0134982.

Christensen, J. B., Muñoz, I. D., Bassler, N., Stengl, C., Bossin, L., Togno, M., Safai, S., Jäkel, O., & Yukihara, E. G. (2023). Optically stimulated luminescence detectors for dosimetry and LET measurements in light ion beams. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 68(15), 155001. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/acdfb0.

Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Revolutionizing STEM Education: Unleashing the Potential of STEM Interest Careers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 1741-1752. doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i7/17608.

Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Rawat, N., Debele, S., Tiwari, A., Mendes Emygdio, A. P., Abhijith, K. V., Kukadia, V., Holmes, K., & Pfautsch, S. (2023). Using empirical science education in schools to improve climate change literacy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113232. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113232.

Garlinska, M., Osial, M., Proniewska, K., & Pregowska, A. (2023). The Influence of Emerging Technologies on Distance Education. Electronics (Switzerland), 12(7), 1550. doi:10.3390/electronics12071550.

Malhotra, A., Futela, D., Joshi, R., Khunte, M., Moily, N. S., Wu, X., Payabvash, S., Wintermark, M., & Gandhi, D. (2024). Academic Radiology Physician Financial Compensation in the United States: Trends and Distribution. Radiology, 313(1), e241057. doi:10.1148/radiol.241057.

Tomkins, L., & Ulus, E. (2016). ‘Oh, was that "experiential learning”?!' Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb's learning cycle. Management Learning, 47(2), 158–178. doi:10.1177/1350507615587451.

Ademola, I. A., Oladejo, A. I., Gbeleyi, O. A., Onowugbeda, F. U., Owolabi, O. L., Okebukola, P. A., Agbanimu, D. O., & Uhuegbu, S. I. (2023). Impact of Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach (CTCA) on Learning Retention: A Study on Nuclear Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 581–588. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00661.

Wisudawati, A. W. (2018). Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education Approach against a Microscopic Representation Skill in Atom and Molecule Concept. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 1–5. doi:10.20885/ijcer.vol2.iss1.art1.

Sasikumar, N., Ramnath, R., & Mahendraprabu, M. (2022). Augmented Reality Based Instructional Approaches to Enhance Understanding Abstract Concepts of Physics among Higher Secondary Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(10), 618–623. doi:10.12691/education-10-10-5.

Ayu, H. D., Jufriadi, A., & Andinisari, R. (2021). High impact on students' understanding of atomics radius on crystals geometry concept through implementation of JITT with 3D animation. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 153–160, 153–160. doi:10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5557.

Ubben, M. S., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2022). Two Cognitive Dimensions of Students' Mental Models in Science: Fidelity of Gestalt and Functional Fidelity. Education Sciences, 12(3), 163. doi:10.3390/educsci12030163.

Tuyizere, G., & Yadav, L. L. (2023). Effect of interactive computer simulations on academic performance and learning motivation of Rwandan students in Atomic Physics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 252–259. doi:10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23617.

Erlina, N., Prayekti, & Wicaksono, I. (2022). Atomic Physics Teaching Materials in Blended Learning to Improve Self-Directed Learning Skills in Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 20–38. doi:10.17718/tojde.1182747.

Fayanto, S., Musria, M., Erniwati, E., Sukariasih, L., & Hunaidah, H. (2019). Implementation of Quantum Teaching Model on Improving Physics Learning Outcomes in the Cognitive Domain at Junior High School. IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education, 1(2), 1958. doi:10.29300/ijisedu.v1i2.1958.

Ubben, M. S., Veith, J. M., Merzel, A., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). Quantum science in a nutshell: fostering students' functional understanding of models. Frontiers in Education, 8. doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1192708.

Das, A. R., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2023). Is STEM a better adaptor than non-STEM groups with online education: an Indian peri-urban experience. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 18(1), 20–33. doi:10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2022-0092.

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students' conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 023108. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108.

Sasanti, W., Hemtasin, C., & Thongsuk, T. (2024). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning to Improve the Analytical Thinking Skills of Sixth-Grade Elementary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 37–56. doi:10.29333/aje.2024.913a.

Kashinath, K., & Raju, R. L. N. (2023). An Empirical Research on the Effectiveness online and Offline Classes of English Language Learning based on Student's Perception in Telangana Schools. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(2), 40–53. doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2023.02.04.

Thi Trang, N., Quoc Khanh, L., & Thi Hong, D. (2024). How Extra Tuition Affect Students Learning? Istanbul Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 51–64. doi:10.62185/issn.3023-5448.2.1.5.

Juškevičienč—, A., Dagienč—, V., & Dolgopolovas, V. (2021). Integrated activities in STEM environment: Methodology and implementation practice. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 209–228. doi:10.1002/cae.22324.

Gumilar, S., & Ismail, A. (2023). The representation of laboratory activities in Indonesian physics textbooks: a content analysis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(2), 614–634. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1928045.

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. doi:10.1177/2158244020938702.

Fakih, M. (2023). Step into a new dimension with augmented reality. Can Augmented Reality (AR) replicate the tactile experience in a virtual mathematics classroom and what is the impact on engagement and deeper understanding? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 28(2), 226–240. doi:10.1080/13596748.2023.2206707.

Vidak, A., Movre Š apič, I., Mešič, V., & Gomzi, V. (2024). Augmented reality technology in teaching about physics: a systematic review of opportunities and challenges. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 23002. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ad0e84.

Chatzopoulos, A., Tzerachoglou, A., Priniotakis, G., Papoutsidakis, M., Drosos, C., & Symeonaki, E. (2023). Using STEM to Educate Engineers about Sustainability: A Case Study in Mechatronics Teaching and Building a Mobile Robot Using Upcycled and Recycled Materials. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21), 15187. doi:10.3390/su152115187.

Cennamo, I., Kastner, M., & Tett, L. (2024). A Comparative Study of Values-Based Fields of Adult Learning and Education in Austria, Scotland, and South Tyrol, Italy: Practitioners Resisting Neoliberal Tendencies Based on Their Ideas of Social Justice. Adult Education Quarterly, 74(1), 23–42. doi:10.1177/07417136231180550.

Rodrigues, A. L. (2023). Entrepreneurship Education Pedagogical Approaches in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(9), 940. doi:10.3390/educsci13090940.

Lee, H. Y., Cheng, Y. P., Wang, W. S., Lin, C. J., & Huang, Y. M. (2023). Exploring the Learning Process and Effectiveness of STEM Education via Learning Behavior Analysis and the Interactive-Constructive- Active-Passive Framework. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 951–976. doi:10.1177/07356331221136888.

Hasan, M. R., & Khan, B. (2023). An AI-based intervention for improving undergraduate STEM learning. PLoS ONE, 18(7), 288844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288844.

A New Approach to Development of Students' Research Abilities in STEM Education

Authors

Downloads

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads

Issue

Section

Keywords

Address

Contact Info: