Influence of Digital Infrastructure on Project Management Success: Readiness, Fitness, and Tools as Moderators
Downloads
In an era defined by rapid digital transformation, project-based organizations face increasing pressure to modernize and digitalize their operational frameworks to ensure competitive advantage and Project Management Success. However, only limited research has examined how foundational pillars of digital infrastructure interact and jointly influence project outcomes, leaving a gap in understanding the structural pathways that link digital infrastructure to Project Management Success and informed decision-making. This study investigates how the three pillars of digital infrastructure (Digital Readiness, Digital Fitness, and Digital Tools) jointly and individually influence Project Management Success through applying Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze survey data collected from experienced project management professionals who possess appreciable experience in digital technology systems and digital transformation leadership. The developed model captures both direct effects of the Digital Infrastructure Pillars on Project Management Success and the moderation effects between them. The results show that all three pillars significantly enhance Project Management Success, with Digital Readiness emerging as the most influential strategic enabler. Moreover, Digital Readiness positively moderates the effect of Digital Tools on Project Management Success, indicating that digital technology investments are more effective when supported by foundational digital preparedness. These findings offer a validated framework for assessing digital maturity in project environments and provide strategic and leadership guidance for organizations seeking to enhance project performance and achieve Project Management Success through balanced investment in digital infrastructure, integrated digital transformation strategies, digital technology adoption, and digital competencies.
Downloads
[1] Badewi, A. (2022). When frameworks empower their agents: The effect of organizational project management frameworks on the performance of project managers and benefits managers in delivering transformation projects successfully. International Journal of Project Management, 40(2), 132–141. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.005.
[2] Gonçalves, M. L. A., Penha, R., Silva, L. F., Martens, C. D. P., & Silva, V. F. (2023). The relationship between project management and digital transformation: Systematic literature review. Revista de Administracao Mackenzie, 24(4), 230075. doi:10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR230075.en.
[3] Zhang, Y. (2024). The Successful Factors for Digital Transformation in Project Management. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 79(1), 297–303. doi:10.54254/2754-1169/79/20241858.
[4] Hussain, H., Jun, W., & Radulescu, M. (2024). Innovation Performance in the Digital Divide Context: Nexus of Digital Infrastructure, Digital Innovation, and E-knowledge. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 3772–3792. doi:10.1007/s13132-024-02058-w.
[5] Yang, Z., & Zhang, J. (2025). Digital infrastructure construction and the development of new-quality productive forces in enterprises. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 24671. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09897-w.
[6] Khasawneh, M. A., & Dweiri, F. (2024). Analyzing the Digital Infrastructure Enabling Project Management Success: A Hybrid FAHP-FTOPSIS Approach. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(17), 8080. doi:10.3390/app14178080.
[7] Aliyev, A. (2025). The AI and Quantum Era: Transforming Project Management Practices. Journal of Future Artificial Intelligence and Technologies, 1(4), 348–370. doi:10.62411/faith.3048-3719-59.
[8] Adamantiadou, D. S., & Tsironis, L. (2025). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Project Management: A Systematic Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. Computers, 14(2), 66. doi:10.3390/computers14020066.
[9] Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. L. (2022). Digitalization of project management: Opportunities in research and practice. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100061. doi:10.1016/j.plas.2022.100061.
[10] Fridgeirsson, T. V., Ingason, H. T., Jonasson, H. I., & Gunnarsdottir, H. (2023). A Qualitative Study on Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on the Project Schedule, Cost and Risk Management Knowledge Areas as Presented in PMBOK®. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(19), 11081. doi:10.3390/app131911081.
[11] Kanski, L., & Pizon, J. (2023). The impact of selected components of industry 4.0 on project management. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100336. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100336.
[12] Chen, X., Chang-Richards, A., Ling, F. Y. Y., Yiu, K. T. W., Pelosi, A., & Yang, N. (2024). Effects of digital readiness on digital competence of AEC companies: a dual-stage PLS-SEM-ANN analysis. Building Research & Information, 52(8), 905–922. doi:10.1080/09613218.2024.2343825.
[13] Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., & Al-Hababi, H. (2024). Mapping the Digital Transformation Maturity of the Building Construction Industry Using Structural Equation Modeling. Buildings, 14(9), 2786. doi:10.3390/buildings14092786.
[14] Li, N., Panichakarn, B., & Xing, T. (2025). Exploring the bridge between digital transformation and sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical study based on Yunnan fresh cut flower supply chain. Journal of Project Management (Canada), 10(2), 185–200. doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2025.3.002.
[15] Mirhosseini, A. F., Pitera, K., Odeck, J., & Welde, M. (2022). Sustainable Project Management: Reducing the Risk of Cost Inaccuracy Using a PLS-SEM Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2), 960. doi:10.3390/su14020960.
[16] Machado, C. G., Winroth, M., Almström, P., Ericson Öberg, A., Kurdve, M., & AlMashalah, S. (2021). Digital organisational readiness: experiences from manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 167–182. doi:10.1108/JMTM-05-2019-0188.
[17] Chounta, I. A., Ortega-Arranz, A., Daskalaki, S., Dimitriadis, Y., & Avouris, N. (2024). Toward a data-informed framework for the assessment of digital readiness of higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 59. doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00491-0.
[18] Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson, New York, United States.
[19] Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
[20] Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 7. doi:10.17705/1cais.00407.
[21] Gun, L., Imamoglu, S. Z., Turkcan, H., & Ince, H. (2024). Effect of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance in the Uncertain Environment: Transformational Leadership and Employee Self-Efficacy as Antecedents of Digital Transformation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(3), 1200. doi:10.3390/su16031200.
[22] Chrusciaka, C. B., Szejkaa, A. L., Juniora, O. C., & Schaefera, J. L. (2025). Human-centric process improvement through digital transformation: contributions and limitations. Production, 35, 20240109. doi:10.1590/0103-6513.20240109.
[23] Nguyen, T. H., Le, X. C., & Vu, T. H. L. (2022). An Extended Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework for Online Retailing Utilization in Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 200. doi:10.3390/joitmc8040200.
[24] Liang, D., & Tian, J. (2024). The Impact of Digital Transformation on the High-Quality Development of Enterprises: An Exploration Based on Meta-Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(8), 3188. doi:10.3390/su16083188.
[25] Tornatzky, L.G. and Fleischer, M. (1990) The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, United States.
[26] Baker, J. (2012). The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework. Information Systems Theory. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 28, Springer, New York, United States. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12.
[27] Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.
[28] Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448.
[29] Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), 103169. doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004.
[30] Willie, M. (2024). Leveraging Digital Resources: A Resource-Based View Perspective. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 01–14. doi:10.52970/grhrm.v5i1.415.
[31] Genest, M. C., & Gamache, S. (2020). Prerequisites for the implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing SMEs. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1215–1220. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.170.
[32] de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Filho, M. G. (2018). When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017.
[33] Elhusseiny, H. M., & Crispim, J. (2021). SMEs, Barriers and Opportunities on adopting Industry 4.0: A Review. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 864–871. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.086.
[34] Nadhifah, M., Putri, R. K., & Sari, P. K. (2025). Analysis of Cyber Security Readiness and Technology Readiness in Digital Transformation in Cooperatives in Bandung City. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(54s), 81–96. doi:10.52783/jisem.v10i54s.11038.
[35] Berlilana, Noparumpa, T., Ruangkanjanases, A., Hariguna, T., & Sarmini. (2021). Organization benefit as an outcome of organizational security adoption: The role of cyber security readiness and technology readiness. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24), 13761. doi:10.3390/su132413761.
[36] Guinan, P. J., Parise, S., & Langowitz, N. (2019). Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 717–727. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.005.
[37] Oberländer, M., Beinicke, A., & Bipp, T. (2020). Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers and Education, 146, 103752. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752.
[38] Vuchkovski, D., Zalaznik, M., Mitręga, M., & Pfajfar, G. (2023). A look at the future of work: The digital transformation of teams from conventional to virtual. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113912. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113912.
[39] Aoun, A., Ilinca, A., Ghandour, M., & Ibrahim, H. (2021). A review of Industry 4.0 characteristics and challenges, with potential improvements using blockchain technology. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 162, 107746. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107746.
[40] Dou, Q., & Gao, X. (2023). How does the digital transformation of corporates affect green technology innovation? An empirical study from the perspective of asymmetric effects and structural breakpoints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139245. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139245.
[41] Yaqub, M. Z., & Alsabban, A. (2023). Industry-4.0-Enabled Digital Transformation: Prospects, Instruments, Challenges, and Implications for Business Strategies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11), 8553. doi:10.3390/su15118553.
[42] Zamora Iribarren, M., Garay-Rondero, C. L., Lemus-Aguilar, I., & Peimbert-García, R. E. (2024). A Review of Industry 4.0 Assessment Instruments for Digital Transformation. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(5), 1693. doi:10.3390/app14051693.
[43] Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2014). Determining Critical Success Factors of Project Management Practice: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.041.
[44] Marques, A., Varajão, J., Sousa, J., & Peres, E. (2013). Project Management Success I-C-E Model – A Work in Progress. Procedia Technology, 9, 910–914. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.101.
[45] Sulistiyani, E., & Tyas, S. H. Y. (2021). What is the measurement of the IT project success? Procedia Computer Science, 197, 282–289. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.142.
[46] Bugarčić, M., & Slavković, M. (2023). Does Digitalization Supports Project Management Effectiveness? New Insight on the Role of Intellectual Capital. Buildings, 13(8), 1898. doi:10.3390/buildings13081898.
[47] Chang, C. L., & Octoyuda, E. (2024). Driving Digital Transformation: How Transformational Leadership Bridges Learning Agility and Digital Technology Adoption in MSMEs. Emerging Science Journal, 8(4), 1583–1601. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-04-020.
[48] Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. (2021). Digital intelligence: A must-have for project managers. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100026. doi:10.1016/j.plas.2021.100026.
[49] Marhraoui, M. A. (2023). Digital skills for project managers: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1591–1598. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.451.
[50] Kozarkiewicz, A. (2020). General and Specific: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Project Processes and Management Methods. Foundations of Management, 12(1), 237–248. doi:10.2478/fman-2020-0018.
[51] Zhang, L., Mohandes, S. R., Tong, Y., Cheung, C., Banihashemi, S., & Shan, M. (2023). Sustainability and Digital Transformation within the Project Management Area: A Science Mapping Approach. Buildings, 13(5), 1355. doi:10.3390/buildings13051355.
[52] Wadi, N., Al-Sulaiti, J. E., & Dahmani, Z. (2023). Digital Transformation Readiness in Infrastructure Project. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil Infrastructure and Construction (CIC 2023), 293–298. doi:10.29117/cic.2023.0041.
[53] Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., & Al-Qahtani, A. (2024). Unveiling Digital Transformation: Analyzing Building Facility Management’s Preparedness for Transformation Using Structural Equation Modeling. Buildings, 14(9), 2794. doi:10.3390/buildings14092794.
[54] Aleca, O. E., & Mihai, F. (2025). The Role of Digital Infrastructure and Skills in Enhancing Labor Productivity: Insights from Industry 4.0 in the European Union. Systems, 13(2), 113. doi:10.3390/systems13020113.
[55] Eversberg, L., & Lambrecht, J. (2023). Evaluating digital work instructions with augmented reality versus paper-based documents for manual, object-specific repair tasks in a case study with experienced workers. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 127(3–4), 1859–1871. doi:10.1007/s00170-023-11313-4.
[56] Obradović, V., Montenegro, A., & Bjelica, D. (2018). Digital Era and Project Manager’s Competencies. European Project Management Journal, 8(1), 4–9. doi:10.18485/epmj.2018.8.1.1.
[57] Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
[58] Hair Jr., J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, United States.
[59] Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008.
[60] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
[61] Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
[62] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, United States.
[63] Ibrahim, M. Y. (2025). The most appropriate scale for behavioral research is a seven-point rating. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(4), 2025126. doi:10.31893/multirev.2025126.
[64] Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656. doi:10.2307/25148814.
[65] Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101.
[66] Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, United States.
[67] Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge, New York, United States. doi:10.4324/9780203771587.
[68] Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom.
[69] Lin, M.-L., & Huynh, L. L. (2024). Bridging causal explanation and predictive modeling: the role of PLS-SEM. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(10), 197–206. doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.3888.
[70] Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049.
[71] Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
[72] Aslan, Ö., Aktuğ, S. S., Ozkan-Okay, M., Yilmaz, A. A., & Akin, E. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Cyber Security Vulnerabilities, Threats, Attacks, and Solutions. Electronics (Switzerland), 12(6), 1333. doi:10.3390/electronics12061333.
[73] Restrepo-Morales, J. A., Ararat-Herrera, J. A., López-Cadavid, D. A., & Camacho-Vargas, A. (2024). Breaking the digitalization barrier for SMEs: a fuzzy logic approach to overcoming challenges in business transformation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 84. doi:10.1186/s13731-024-00429-w.
[74] Mayer, M., & Lu, Y. C. (2025). Global structures of digital dependence and the rise of technopoles. New Political Economy, 30(5), 755–774. doi:10.1080/13563467.2025.2497766.
[75] Zhao, X., & Dong, F. (2025). Digital infrastructure construction and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from Broadband China Strategy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 347. doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04614-4.
[76] Wang, Q., Ning, Z., & Tan, M. (2025). A study on the impact of digital infrastructure development on the health of low-income rural residents: based on panel data from 2010 to 2022. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1503522. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1503522.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
