1. Home
  2. Vol 7 (2023)
  3. Malashenko

A Digital Model of Full-Cycle Training Based on the Zettelkasten and Interval Repetition System

Gevorg T. Malashenko, Mikhail E. Kosov, Svetlana V. Frumina, Olga A. Grishina, Roman A. Alandarov, Vadim V. Ponkratov, Tatyana A. Bloshenko, Lola D. Sanginova, Svetlana S. Dzusova, Munther F. Hasan

Abstract


The study aims to propose and validate a new digital model based on the Zettelkasten and interval repetition system for comprehensive and full-cycle training of the students. The core idea is to enhance the learning experience and effectiveness of the given training course by enhancing the student's attention during the learning and long-term information retention. In pursuit of the aforementioned research aim, the study incorporates a quantitative research methodology by combining experiments and a survey. In particular, the effectiveness of the proposed model was assessed via an achievement assessment involving two groups of students and assessing their scores on the same test. This was followed by a metacognitive awareness survey of the two groups to investigate their perceived understanding and performance (with and without the use of a model). The proposed model was found to be effective in enhancing the learning experience and effectiveness of the students on the training course. The Zettelkasten facilitates the management of the student's attention, while the interval repetition system contributes to increased retention. The students that used this model in their learning and preparation scored better than their peers. Also, they reported a significantly higher understanding and awareness of their learning than their peers. The model can be incorporated into the learning process or the provision of training courses to the students. This study is the first to suggest the integration of Zettelkasten and the interval repetition system into one learning model for the students. The article proposes a practical model that can be incorporated by teachers to improve the learning effectiveness of their students. This article has some limitations as well that must be acknowledged.

 

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-SIED2-01

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Digital Model; Full-Cycle Training; Zettelkasten; Interval Repetition System; Learning Effectiveness; Hyperfocus; Student Performance; Student Attention; Information Retention Learning Experience.

References


Ganesh, M., & Indradevi, R. (2015). Importance and effectiveness of training and development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 334–338. doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p334.

Helbig, D. K. (2019). Life without toothache: Hans Blumenberg’s Zettelkasten and history of science as theoretical attitude. Journal of the History of Ideas, 80(1), 91–112. doi:10.1353/jhi.2019.0005.

Versteeg, M., Hendriks, R. A., Thomas, A., Ommering, B. W. C., & Steendijk, P. (2020). Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review. Medical Education, 54(3), 205–216. doi:10.1111/medu.14025.

Ratcliffe, J. (2021). Using a zettelkasten to manage your ideas. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 10(1), 37–39. doi:10.12968/joan.2021.10.1.37.

Inie, N., Frich, J., & Dalsgaard, P. (2022). How Researchers Manage Ideas. Creativity and Cognition, ACM Digital Library 83-96. doi: 10.1145/3527927.3532813.

de Aragão Fraga, F. P. (2022). On Automatic Generation of Knowledge Connections. Doctoral dissertation, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro – PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Laursen, K. B., Harste, G., & Roth, S. (2022). Moral communication observed with social systems theory. An introduction. Kybernetes, 51(5), 1653–1665. doi:10.1108/K-01-2022-0059.

Ahrens, S. (2022). How to take smart notes: One simple technique to boost writing, learning and thinking. Sönke Ahrens, Germany.

Stepanchuk, Y.A. (2019). Bridging the Digital Gap in Academic Writing and Information Management: The Case of Humanities Students. Digital Transformation and Global Society, DTGS 2019, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1038, Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_45.

Pyne, Y., & Stewart, S. (2022). Meta-work: How we research is as important as what we research. British Journal of General Practice, 72(716), 130–131. doi:10.3399/bjgp22X718757.

Matysek, A., & Tomaszczyk, J. (2020). Digital wisdom in research work. Issues of Scientific Information - Information Studies, 58(2A(116A)), 98–113. doi:10.36702/zin.705.

Smith, C. D., & Scarf, D. (2017). Spacing Repetitions Over Long Timescales: A Review and a Reconsolidation Explanation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00962.

Reddy, S., Labutov, I., Banerjee, S., & Joachims, T. (2016). Unbounded Human Learning. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1815–1824. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939850.

Rodrigues, A. L. (2020). Digital technologies integration in teacher education: The active teacher training model. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3), 24–33. doi:10.20368/1971-8829/1135273.

Majeed, A., & Shakeel, S. (2017). Importance of training and development in the workplace. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(4), 498-504.

Liu, Z. J., Tretyakova, N., Fedorov, V., & Kharakhordina, M. (2020). Digital literacy and digital didactics as the basis for new learning models development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 4–18. doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14669.

von Niederhäusern, L. (2020). Exploring Asynchronic Experiences – Seven Motifs: A Zettelkasten as (Filmic) Research Method. MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research, 4(1), 1–12. doi:10.5334/mjfar.73.

Korolev, S., & Lyalina, I. (2021). The rating Brain of Bureaucrats and Luhrmann’s Zettelkasten: two versions of the “Machine Man” in the age of digitalization. SHS Web of Conferences, 106, 04008. doi:10.1051/shsconf/202110604008.

Settles, B., & Meeder, B. (2016). A Trainable Spaced Repetition Model for Language Learning. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany1848–1858. doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1174.

Amiri, H., Miller, T., & Savova, G. (2017). Repeat before Forgetting: Spaced Repetition for Efficient and Effective Training of Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1255

Hung, R., & Wati, U. A. (2020). ‘Digital Home Schooling’ During the Pandemic: Possibilities and Challenges. Knowledge Cultures, 8(2), 36–43. doi:10.22381/KC8220206.

Alamri, H. A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning Technology Models that Support Personalization within Blended Learning Environments in Higher Education. TechTrends, 65(1), 62–78. doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00530-3.

Schuetze, U. (2015). Spacing techniques in second language vocabulary acquisition: Short-term gains vs. long-term memory. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 28–42. doi:10.1177/1362168814541726.

Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research Methods in TEFL Studies: Descriptive Research, Case Study, Error Analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197. doi:10.17507/jltr.0901.25.

Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses’ Association, 22(2), 27–30. doi:10.33235/jarna.22.2.27-30.

Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010.

Biereenu-Nnabugwu, M. (2019). Thoughts and Perspectives on Techniques and Tools of Qualitative Data Analysis in Political Inquiry. Socialscientia: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 55–72.

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th Ed.), Pearson, London, United Kingdom.

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. doi:10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7.

O’Neil, H. F., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(4), 234–245. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9941208.

El-Seoud, S. A., El-Khouly, M. M., & Taj-Eddin, I. A. T. F. (2016). Motivation in E-Learning: How Do We Keep Learners Motivated in an E-Learning Environment? International Journal of Learning, 2(1), 63–66. doi:10.18178/IJLT.2.1.63-66.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, United States.

Maddox, H., & Hoole, E. (1975). Performance decrement in the lecture. Educational Review, 28(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/0013191750280102.

Tabibian, B., Upadhyay, U., De, A., Zarezade, A., Schölkopf, B., & Gomez-Rodriguez, M. (2019). Enhancing human learning via spaced repetition optimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 3988–3993. doi:10.1073/pnas.1815156116.

Phillips, J. L., Heneka, N., Bhattarai, P., Fraser, C., & Shaw, T. (2019). Effectiveness of the spaced education pedagogy for clinicians’ continuing professional development: a systematic review. Medical Education, 53(9), 886–902. doi:10.1111/medu.13895.

Yuan, X. (2022). Evidence of the Spacing Effect and Influences on Perceptions of Learning and Science Curricula. Cureus, 14(1), 21201. doi:10.7759/cureus.21201.

Brown, P. C., Roediger III, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, United States. doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wprs3.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-SIED2-01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Gevorg T. Malashenko, Mikhail E. Kosov, Svetlana V. Frumina, Olga A. Grishina, Roman A. Alandarov, Vadim V. Ponkratov, Tatyana A. Bloshenko, Lola D. Sanginova, Svetlana S. Dzusova