Project-Based Learning With TikTok: A Digital Strategy for OHS Regulatory Training
Downloads
This study examines the pedagogical integration of TikTok within a Project-Based Learning (PBL) framework to enhance the teaching and internalization of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) regulations in higher education, specifically Executive Decree 255. The primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of student-created TikTok videos in fostering active learning, regulatory comprehension, and the development of key academic and professional competencies. Seventy-three undergraduate students from the Practicum III course in the OHS program at Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja participated in the initiative. The structured methodology comprised five phases: topic assignment, digital training, guided video production, public dissemination, and multidimensional evaluation. Student outcomes were assessed through rubric-based evaluation, TikTok engagement analytics, and a validated satisfaction questionnaire addressing eight pedagogical constructs (Cronbach’s α=0.989; KMO=0.934). Results indicate enhanced conceptual understanding, increased motivation, and the strengthening of transversal competencies such as digital communication and learner autonomy. The novelty of this approach lies in the purposeful use of a widely adopted social media platform as both a pedagogical tool and a dissemination medium, offering a replicable model for other STEM disciplines that require the translation of complex regulatory or technical content into engaging and accessible formats.
Downloads
[1] Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education, 182, 104463. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463.
[2] McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479.
[3] Vergara, D., Fernández-Arias, P., Extremera, J., Dávila, L. P., & Rubio, M. P. (2022). Educational trends post COVID-19 in engineering: Virtual laboratories. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49, 155–160. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.494.
[4] Matsieli, M., & Mutula, S. (2024). COVID-19 and Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: Towards Inclusive and Equitable Access to Quality Education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 819. doi:10.3390/educsci14080819.
[5] Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., … Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542.
[6] Durán, R., Estay-Niculcar, C., & Álvarez, H. (2015). Adoption of good virtual education practices in higher education. Aula Abierta, 43(2), 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.aula.2015.01.001.
[7] Caballini, C., Agostino, M., & Dalla Chiara, B. (2021). Physical mobility and virtual communication in Italy: Trends, analytical relationships and policies for the post COVID-19. Transport Policy, 110, 314–334. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.007.
[8] Sagredo-Lillo, E., Zapata, J. L., Parra-Urrea, Y., & Llanos-Lagos, E. (2024). Organizational Climate Management in the Context of Initial Mathematics Teacher Education. Emerging Science Journal, 8, 311–320. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-SIED1-018.
[9] Gil-Cordero, E., Rodriguez-Rad, C., Ledesma-Chaves, P., & Sánchez del Río-Vázquez, M. E. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of face-to-face marketing learning via TikTok, YouTube and video conferencing. Heliyon, 9(7), e17195. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17195.
[10] Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers and Education, 75, 112–126. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002.
[11] Mulenga, R., & Shilongo, H. (2024). Hybrid and Blended Learning Models: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions in Education. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(1), 1–13. doi:10.53623/apga.v4i1.495.
[12] Pandita, A., & Kiran, R. (2023). The Technology Interface and Student Engagement Are Significant Stimuli in Sustainable Student Satisfaction. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10), 7923. doi:10.3390/su15107923.
[13] Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Strategies, Methods, and Supports for Developing Skills within Learning Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 231. doi:10.3390/admsci14090231.
[14] Ang, K. C. S., Afzal, F., & Crawford, L. H. (2021). Transitioning from passive to active learning: Preparing future project leaders. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100016. doi:10.1016/j.plas.2021.100016.
[15] Chigbu, B. I., Ngwevu, V., & Jojo, A. (2023). The effectiveness of innovative pedagogy in the industry 4.0: Educational ecosystem perspective. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 7(1), 100419. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100419.
[16] Song, Y., Weisberg, L. R., Zhang, S., Tian, X., Boyer, K. E., & Israel, M. (2024). A framework for inclusive AI learning design for diverse learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100212. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100212.
[17] Tsybulsky, D., & Muchnik-Rozanov, Y. (2019). The development of student-teachers’ professional identity while team-teaching science classes using a project-based learning approach: A multi-level analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 48–59. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.006.
[18] Chu, S. K. W., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Chan, C. K., Lee, C. W. Y., Zou, E., & Lau, W. (2017). The effectiveness of wikis for project-based learning in different disciplines in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 49-60. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.005.
[19] Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A. M., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10(23), e39988. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988.
[20] Laroche, E., L’Espérance, S., & Mosconi, E. (2020). Use of social media platforms for promoting healthy employee lifestyles and occupational health and safety prevention: A systematic review. Safety Science, 131, 104931. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104931.
[21] Rodeghiero Neto, I., & Amaral, F. G. (2024). Teaching occupational health and safety in engineering using active learning: A systematic review. Safety Science, 171, 106391. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106391.
[22] Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. doi:10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
[23] Guaya, D. E., Jaramillo-Fierro, X. V., Meneses, M. A., & Valarezo, E. (2024). Innovative Chemical Engineering Education: Social Media-Enhanced Project-Based Learning Approaches. Emerging Science Journal, 8(Special issue), 358–378. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-SIED1-021.
[24] Abdul Aziz, H. A., & Mohd Dali, S. Z. (2023). More Than Just Engaging? Tiktok As an Effective Educational Tool. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 8(52), 133–142. doi:10.35631/ijepc.852011.
[25] Lamimi, I. J., Alaoui, S. M., & Ouelfatmi, M. (2024). Bite-Sized Learning on TikTok: Exploring the Platform’s Educational Value within the Framework of TAM (Technology Acceptance Theory). Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(04), 228–245. doi:10.4236/jss.2024.124015.
[26] Suryatiningsih, N., Widodo, D. P., Baiduri, B., & Eriyanti, R. W. (2025). TikTok as an Effective Tool for English Language Learning: A Digital Ethics Perspective. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 6(2), 405–416. doi:10.37251/jee.v6i2.1628.
[27] Xavierine, J., & Shanthi, A. (2024). Evaluating TikTok’s Educational Impact: An Analysis of Student Perspectives. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(X), 1931–1945. doi:10.47772/ijriss.2024.8100166.
[28] Siraji, A. D. (2025). Exploring how TikTok contents drive student’s motivation for linguistic competence in English. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(1), 3091. doi:10.59429/esp.v10i1.3091.
[29] Thi Mai Oanh, L. (2025). Short-Form Videos and Student Learning: Examining the Impact of TikTok. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 41, 47–61. doi:10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4977.
[30] Thi Nguyet Trang, T., Chien Thang, P., Thi Truong Nguyen, G., & Thi Minh Nguyen, H. (2025). Factors driving Gen Z’s news engagement on TikTok: A hybrid analysis through CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18, 100645. doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100645.
[31] Arthur, R., Anisah, A., Wijayanti, I., & Sidik, J. (2021). Occupational Health and Safety Animated Learning Videos: Validity and Feasibility. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(1), 25192. doi:10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.25192.
[32] Colomer, J., Serra, T., Cañabate, D., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9), 3827. doi:10.3390/su12093827.
[33] Dantas, L. A., & Cunha, A. (2020). An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning process. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 2(1), 100017. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100017.
[34] Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21), 13955. doi:10.3390/su142113955.
[35] Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357–442. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00012-9.
[36] Fan, D., Lo, C. K. Y., Ching, V., & Kan, C. W. (2014). Occupational health and safety issues in operations management: A systematic and citation network analysis review. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 334–344. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.025.
[37] Ricci, F., Chiesi, A., Bisio, C., Panari, C., & Pelosi, A. (2016). Effectiveness of occupational health and safety training: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(6), 355–377. doi:10.1108/JWL-11-2015-0087.
[38] Vitrano, G., & Micheli, G. J. L. (2024). Effectiveness of Occupational Safety and Health interventions: a long way to go. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1292692. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292692.
[39] Duryan, M., Smyth, H., Roberts, A., Rowlinson, S., & Sherratt, F. (2020). Knowledge transfer for occupational health and safety: Cultivating health and safety learning culture in construction firms. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 139, 105496. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105496.
[40] Floyde, A., Lawson, G., Shalloe, S., Eastgate, R., & D’Cruz, M. (2013). The design and implementation of knowledge management systems and e-learning for improved occupational health and safety in small to medium sized enterprises. Safety Science, 60, 69–76. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.012.
[41] Freitas, A. C., & Silva, S. A. (2017). Exploring OHS trainers’ role in the transfer of training. Safety Science, 91, 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.007.
[42] I.L.O. (2023). Nearly 3 million people die of work-related accidents and diseases. International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/nearly-3-million-people-die-work-related-accidents-and-diseases (accessed on November 2025).
[43] Endroyo, B., Yuwono, B. E., Mardapi, D., & Soenarto. (2015). Model of learning/training of Occupational Safety & Health (OSH) based on industry in the construction industry. Procedia Engineering, 125, 83–88. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.013.
[44] Schulte, P. A., Stephenson, C. M., Okun, A. H., Palassis, J., & Biddle, E. (2005). Integrating occupational safety and health information into vocational and technical education and other workforce preparation programs. American Journal of Public Health, 95(3), 404–411. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.047241.
[45] Annan, J. S., Addai, E. K., & Tulashie, S. K. (2015). A Call for Action to Improve Occupational Health and Safety in Ghana and a Critical Look at the Existing Legal Requirement and Legislation. Safety and Health at Work, 6(2), 146–150. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2014.12.002.
[46] I.LO. (2017). Building a Generation of Safe and Healthy Workers - Safe & Healthy Youth. In Safe and healthy youth Guide for the mainstreaming of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) in vocational training programmes. International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Availbale online: https://www.ilo.org/jakarta/whatwedo/projects/WCMS_553229/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on November 2025).
[47] Mureșan, P. I., Milosan, I., Pavalache-Ilie, M., Gabor, C., & Oancea, G. (2024). Evaluation of the Training Process of Health and Safety at Work in Industry through Digitalization—Case Study: Position in Organization. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(18), 8502. doi:10.3390/app14188502.
[48] Vukićević, A. M., Mačužić, I., Djapan, M., Milićević, V., & Shamina, L. (2021). Digital training and advanced learning in occupational safety and health based on modern and affordable technologies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24), 13641. doi:10.3390/su132413641.
[49] Jiajia, L., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2024). The Acceptance of TikTok as a Tool for EFL Learning among High School Students in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 23739. doi:10.6007/ijarped/v13-i4/23739.
[50] Wang, X., & Shang, Q. (2024). How do social and parasocial relationships on TikTok impact the well-being of university students? The roles of algorithm awareness and compulsive use. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104369. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104369.
[51] Nguyen, H., & Diederich, M. (2023). Facilitating knowledge construction in informal learning: A study of TikTok scientific, educational videos. Computers and Education, 205, 104896. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104896.
[52] Carpenter, J. P., Morrison, S. A., Shelton, C. C., Clark, N., Patel, S., & Toma-Harrold, D. (2024). How and why educators use TikTok: Come for the fun, stay for the learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 142, 104530. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104530.
[53] Otto, T., & Thies, B. (2024). Exploring the influence of instagram use on materialism and situational intrinsic learning motivation: An online experimental study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 23463–23494. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12762-4.
[54] Tan, K. H., Rajendran, A., Muslim, N., Alias, J., & Yusof, N. A. (2022). The Potential of TikTok’s Key Features as a Pedagogical Strategy for ESL Classrooms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24), 16876. doi:10.3390/su142416876.
[55] Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68–79. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006.
[56] Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., Lin, H. M., & Chuang, S. C. (2004). Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A LISREL analysis. Computers and Education, 43(3), 237–248. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.006.
[57] Nabavi, R. T., & Bijandi, M. S. (2012). Bandura’s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory. Theory of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 1-24.
[58] Al-Hail, M., Zguir, M. F., & Koç, M. (2024). Exploring Digital Learning Opportunities and Challenges in Higher Education Institutes: Stakeholder Analysis on the Use of Social Media for Effective Sustainability of Learning–Teaching–Assessment in a University Setting in Qatar. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(15). doi:10.3390/su16156413.
[59] Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., & Andersen, B. (2020). Does project-based learning (PBL) promote student learning? a performance evaluation. Education Sciences, 10(11), 1–15. doi:10.3390/educsci10110330.
[60] Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. doi:10.3390/educsci12100728.
[61] Perkins, D. (2024). 7 Steps To Plan Project Based Learning. ThoughtStretchers Education. Availbale online: https://wegrowteachers.com/7-steps-plan-project-based-learning/ (accessed on November 2025).
[62] Moure Abelenda, A., Aiouache, F., & Moreno-Mediavilla, D. (2023). Adapted business model canvas template and primary market research for project-based learning on management of slurry. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 30, 103106. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2023.103106.
[63] Wang, S., Sun, Z., Li, M., Zhang, H., & Metwally, A. H. S. (2024). Leveraging TikTok for active learning in management education: An extended technology acceptance model approach. International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 101009. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101009.
[64] Violot, C., Elmas, T., Bilogrevic, I., & Humbert, M. (2024). Shorts vs. regular videos on YouTube: A comparative analysis of user engagement and content creation trends. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference, 213-223. doi:10.1145/3614419.3644023.
[65] Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2025). Technology Affordances, Social Media Engagement, and Social Media Addiction: An Investigation of TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 28(5), 318–325. doi:10.1089/cyber.2024.0338.
[66] Mayasari, R., Agoestyowati, R., & Rasyad, R. Z. (2025). Analysis of the Influence of Instagram and TikTok on Motivation and Learning Outcomes of High School Students in Indonesia. International Journal Education and Computer Studies (IJECS), 5(2), 103–113. doi:10.35870/ijecs.v5i2.4616.
[67] Gálvez-Ruiz, P., López-Carril, S., Watanabe, N. M., & Lara-Bocanegra, A. (2025). TikTok as a learning tool in higher education: Validation of a scale. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 36, 100548. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2025.100548.
[68] Nochumson, T. (2025). Exploring TikTok’s Role in K-12 Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of Teachers’ Professional Use. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 127-157.
[69] Etol, E., Rabalos, M. J., Sumatra, A. G., Allanic, R., & Embang, S. (2024). Exploring the Pedagogical Potential of YouTube and TikTok: An Empirical Analysis of Platform Acceptance in a Tertiary Education Institution. Journal of Higher Education Research Disciplines, 9(2), 71-105.
[70] Jimola, F. (2023). Undergraduate students’ exploration of Instagram and TikTok in learning language skills contents: A leverage to digital literacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 5, 84–95. doi:10.38140/ijer-2023.vol5.08.
[71] Brandon, A. F., & All, A. C. (2010). Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 89–92.
[72] Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. Educational Theory, 39–61.
[73] Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Alguacil, M., & López-Carril, S. (2021). Incorporating TikTok in higher education: Pedagogical perspectives from a corporal expression sport sciences course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 28(100302). doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100302.
[74] Alloway, T. P., Horton, J., & Alloway, R. G. (2013). Social networking sites and cognitive abilities: Do they make you smarter? Computers and Education, 63, 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.030.
[75] Degner, M., Moser, S., & Lewalter, D. (2022). Digital media in institutional informal learning places: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100068. doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100068.
[76] Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.
[77] Pozzo, D. N., Biegelmeyer, U. H., Gomez Pedroza, F. J., Grados, E. A., Barrera, M. B., Craco, T., & Fermiano Fidelis, A. C. (2024). The impact of TikTok as an educational tool on students’ performance: A multi-group comparison of international business classes in Peru and Colombia. Procedia Computer Science, 238, 989–994. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.124.
[78] López-Carril, S., González-Serrano, M. H., Ribeiro, T., & Jiménez-Jiménez, P. (2024). TikTok for learning through movement, dramatization, and music: Insights for higher education applications in sport sciences. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 35. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100501.
[79] Albalushi, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Sirasanagandla, S. R., & Das, S. (2022). Students’ Performance in Face-to-Face, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Teaching and Assessment in Anatomy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13318. doi:10.3390/ijerph192013318.
[80] Wang, S., Yang, D., Shehata, B., & Li, M. (2023). Exploring effects of intelligent recommendation, interactivity, and playfulness on learning engagement: An application of TikTok considering the meditation of anxiety and moderation of virtual reward. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107951. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107951.
[81] Kubikova, K., Bohacova, A., Slowik, J., & Pavelkova, I. (2024). Student adaptation to distance learning: An analysis of the effectiveness, benefits and risks of distance education from the perspective of university students. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, 100875. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100875.
[82] Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers and Education, 165, 104132. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132.
[83] Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers and Education, 63, 306–317. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014.
[84] Yang, Y., Lin, J., Chen, T., Lin, S., Chen, J., Miao, W., Wei, W., Sun, H., Sun, J., & Gu, C. (2022). A study on the effects of perceived playfulness and emotional support in interactive learning environments for German language acquisition—A role-playing library system case. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1073985. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1073985.
[85] Kuhlmann, S. L., Plumley, R., Evans, Z., Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., Hogan, K. A., Berro, M., Gates, K., & Panter, A. (2024). Students’ active cognitive engagement with instructional videos predicts STEM learning. Computers and Education, 216(105050). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105050.
[86] Lawson, H. A., & Lawson, M. A. (2020). Student engagement and disengagement as a collective action problem. Education Sciences, 10(8), 1–20. doi:10.3390/educsci10080212.
[87] Zhang, Y., & Song, Y. (2022). The Effects of Sensory Cues on Immersive Experiences for Fostering Technology-Assisted Sustainable Behavior: A Systematic Review. Behavioral Sciences, 12(10), 361. doi:10.3390/bs12100361.
[88] Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657.
[89] Çakıroğlu, Ü., Aydın, M., Özkan, A., Turan, Ş., & Cihan, A. (2021). Perceived learning in virtual reality and animation-based learning environments: A case of the understanding our body topic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5109–5126. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10522-2.
[90] Petersen, G. B., Petkakis, G., & Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers and Education, 179, 104429. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429.
[91] Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information and Management, 53(4), 504–516. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005.
[92] Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers and Education, 54(3), 759–766. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.033.
[93] Shabur, M. A., & Siddiki, M. R. (2024). Investigating social media’s impact on the new era of interactive learning: A case study of Bangladesh. Heliyon, 10(4), e26234. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26234.
[94] Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jay, T. (2016). Reward, learning and games. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 65–72. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.015.
[95] Gao, S. Y., Tsai, Y. Y., Huang, J. H., Ma, Y. X., & Wu, T. liang. (2023). TikTok for developing learning motivation and oral proficiency in MICE learners. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 32, 100415. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100415.
[96] Purvis, A. J., Rodger, H. M., & Beckingham, S. (2020). Experiences and perspectives of social media in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100018. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100018.
[97] Izuagbe, R., Ifijeh, G., Izuagbe-Roland, E. I., Olawoyin, O. R., & Ogiamien, L. O. (2019). Determinants of perceived usefulness of social media in university libraries: Subjective norm, image and voluntariness as indicators. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(4), 394–405. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2019.03.006.
[98] Owusu, G. M. Y., Bekoe, R. A., Otoo, D. S., & Koli, A. P. E. (2019). Adoption of social networking sites for educational use. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 2–19. doi:10.1108/JARHE-04-2018-0069.
[99] Gómez-Ortiz, M. J., Domínguez Romero, E., & Bobkina, J. (2023). Instagram as a learning tool to improve technical vocabulary for sports science students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 32. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100416.
[100] Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications, New York, United States.
[101] Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575.
[102] Lijo, R., Quevedo, E., & Juan Castro, J. (2024). The Dual Use of Didactic Videos in STEM Education and Dissemination: A Survey-Based Analysis. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 19, 157–168. doi:10.1109/RITA.2024.3465020.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
